Family episodes
Every new memory begins as a candidate, not as automatic truth.
Digital family memory
This new frontend centers the product around trust: the avatar answers from preserved memory, routes new episodes into family review, and only then lets them become part of live memory.
Connected to the current chat, review workflow, and presentation. Existing product routes remain unchanged.
Connected demo
This section no longer plays a local fake chat. It sends questions to the existing demo API and renders the reply, trace, evidence, and any review candidate the backend returns.
Ask about childhood, family ties, or a concrete memory. If supporting evidence is missing, the system should say so and create a review candidate instead of improvising.
What gets preserved
Every new memory begins as a candidate, not as automatic truth.
The avatar answers only from what the backend allows as confirmed memory.
Czech, Russian, and English each run with their own interface and content version.
Families choose how the avatar should sound, at what remembered age, and with what temperament.
Nothing enters live memory without explicit review and an indexing step.
The architecture keeps content, view logic, and the API layer separate for future growth.
How it flows
photos, text, voice, family episodes
owner approval and multiple perspectives
only approved and allowed entries
sources for a specific answer
say 'I do not know' when evidence is missing
voice, expression, and reply for the family
A life in time
The cards are prepared for real photos, video, and transcript material later.
Late memories often mix warmth, humor, and retrospect. The interface should carry that without sentimentality.
Avatar studio
For now the studio acts as a product configurator. It does not pretend to write into the backend, but it keeps the data model clean and ready for extension.
Original recording · Gentle · English · 62
The family should define the return, not the model on its own.
Continue to live chatThe age the avatar should project. This value changes only inside this preview.
What this is for
If the avatar is unsure, it should say so. That matters more than smoothness.
A useful avatar needs to feel close while remaining factually disciplined.
Multiple generations need access to the same story without silent rewrites.
The review workflow keeps disputed or newly proposed versions out of confirmed memory until they are approved.
What matters is not just the answer, but trust that it sounds like someone real.
The design keeps a calm luminous tone without cheap sci-fi effects or mobile overload.
You can ship it as a test route, compare it against the current experience, and only then decide whether to switch the homepage.